Today, we’re doing something similar.
Summary (aka. TLDR…)
- Quiet Quitting has many overlapping definitions based on context. Overall, it is a shift in workforce mindset.
- Managers tend to complain about Quiet Quitting because of the noted costs incurred to an employer organization.
- Globally, Quiet Quitting is attributed to cost $9 trillion dollars.
- This article dives into the origins and evolutions of Quiet Quitting.
- And, seeks to calculate the specific costs to Physical Therapy and Rehab Therapy at large.
- Quiet Quitting is absolutely happening in our industry – to the tune of 72% of the workforce stating that they have observed it in action.
- The A.I. calculations yielded a Quiet Quitting loss of $28k per annum for a PT that is Quiet quitting.
- There are even more workplace cultural considerations to attend to, given the qualitative sentiments of the given poll responses.
Headlines.
Headlines!
HEADLINES!
AND, from such headlines… key phrases such as:
- Quiet quitting costs the world’s economy almost $9 trillion per year
- Work doesn’t make people unhappy; the workplace does.
- Quiet quitting will continue until organizations hire better managers.
- A company’s workforce may be comprised of up to 40% quiet quitters.
- Quiet quitting causes your best employees to actually quit.
- A UK study demonstrated 27% of employees feeling daily sadness, and 20% feeling daily anger at work.
There are articles published all over major channels and business brands such as Gallup and McKinsey… it’s plastered across Linked In; and, all you have to do is a search for the term and the craziest headlines will show up which are both entertaining and alarming.
Here are some highlighted comments from these polls:
- Quiet Quitting: This recent trend reflects a shift in employee mentality towards disengagement, focusing on core responsibilities rather than exceeding expectations.
- Industry Variations: Disengagement rates might vary across industries, but data specific to physical therapy and allied rehab therapy is currently limited.
- Cost per Disengaged Employee: While the global impact is staggering, it’s also helpful to see the cost on a per-employee basis. According to Gallup, disengaged employees cost their organization an average of 18% of their annual salary. Other studies put this figure as high as 34%.
- Gallup Estimates: A Gallup study suggests disengaged employees are 16% to 20% less productive than engaged colleagues [Gallup, State of the Global Workplace Report 2022].
-
Therapist’s Potential Annual Revenue Generation:
- Patients per Day (8) x Visits per Patient (assumed 1 for this example) x Visits per Year (240 working days) x Revenue per Visit ($100) = $192,000
-
Productivity Loss due to Quiet Quitting:
- 10% x $192,000 = $19,200
- This is a simplified model and doesn’t account for:
- Overhead costs (rent, utilities, etc.)
- Benefits (insurance, etc.)
- Non-revenue generating activities (documentation, meetings)
- The impact might be indirect:
- Fewer patients seen could lead to lost revenue.
- Reduced quality of care could require additional visits or impact patient satisfaction.
- Average Salary (AS): $85,000 (assuming same for therapists and assistants) – Note: This might underestimate the cost if therapists are paid more than assistants.
- Average Revenue per Visit (ARV): $100 (placeholder, can vary by discipline)
- Therapists per Day (TPD): 8 (assuming same number of patients per clinician per day)
- Working Days per Year (WDY): 240 (standard workweek with 2 weeks vacation)
- Disciplines (D): [“Physical Therapy”, “Occupational Therapy”, “Speech Therapy”]
- Clinical FTEs per Discipline (CFTE): 3
- This is a simplified model with assumptions about salaries and productivity.
- The true cost might be higher if therapists are paid more than assistants.
- The impact of disengagement on support staff tasks (e.g., scheduling) is not considered.
One Final Calculation.
After many queries, we finally went down the line for something simple now that this A.I. session built up enough calculus to give (hopefully) a more condensed answer – and, answer, it did!
- We use the previously calculated annual revenue as the baseline.
- The productivity decline (10%) represents the estimated decrease in revenue due to quiet quitting.
- The revenue loss is the product of these two factors.
- This is a simplified model and assumes a consistent patient volume and revenue per visit throughout the year. In reality, these might fluctuate.
- The actual impact of quiet quitting can vary depending on several factors:
- Severity of Disengagement: A 10% decline might be an underestimate or overestimate depending on the specific therapist’s behavior.
- Reduced Patient Quality of Care: Quiet quitting might lead to shorter appointments or less attentive care, potentially requiring additional visits (indirect revenue loss).
- Lower Patient Satisfaction: Disengaged therapists could lead to lower patient satisfaction, impacting referrals (indirect revenue loss).
- Staff Morale: A disengaged therapist might negatively influence colleagues, impacting overall clinic culture.
- Increased Turnover: Disengaged therapists are more likely to seek new opportunities, leading to recruitment and training costs.
So, with all that A.I. calculus and code… What Does It MEAN?
Conclusions To Consider
Global Number versus Industry Specific
Most macroeconomic studies reference a workforce to host 20% – 40% of an organization’s employees being in a Quiet Quitting mode at any given point in time.
Given that the underreporting ratio for general topics is 5-10% and upwards of 20-50% for sensitive topics, we can estimate that the Physical Therapy and Allied Rehab Therapy workforce is probably somewhere in the 6 – 12% range participating, with over 70% observing this behavior.
Obviously, the numbers don’t add up… and, likely are much higher.
Damage Report
Over a third of poll respondents as of writing this blog state that they both observe Quiet Quitting behaviors AND that it is damaging either operationally, financially, or both.
Financially speaking, we’re looking at easily 5-10% loss of production; and, very likely… a compounding effect across both work teams as well as a sequela of employee retention challenges.
If you wish to review the cost of mere turnover, you can do so HERE.
Bottomline, A.I. calculates a loss for a PT from quiet quitting to be $20-30k per FTE per year.
Cultural Contentions
It is absolutely interesting that the “younger” Facebook group poll respondents had a majority report jumping all over the term Quiet Quitting and immediately associating it with generations their senior.
There is also a certain strife that comes with that state of mind; which means that such a huge pocket of our colleagues also likely fit into the UK study showing large chunks of the workforce being “sad” or “angry” at work on the daily.
This should be a concerning look at the mind state of the workforce at large. A bridge must be built, otherwise a mass effect will occur.
Actions to Take
1. Stomp out mediocrity. Reward Excellence.
The odds are, if you have 3 FTEs in your clinic… someone is Quiet Quitting. Now, imagine that with size and scale.It remains unaddressed and unattended by very nature that it is done quietly. Decision makers and managers MUST make this topic one that is spoke and addressed OUT LOUD. The Gallup article referenced earlier stated: “Work doesn’t make people unhappy; the workplace does. Quiet quitting will continue until organizations hire better managers.“The action that must be taken here is first making a space where active feedback can be received; several comments shown above in thread mentioned a disheartened employee due to a high Tolerance to Mediocrity, or worse that excellence wasn’t rewarded.
Managers must determine if this exists within their ranks, and if so… to garner immediate attention with measurable action to remedy.
2. Upper and Executive Managers need to immediately evaluate their quality of middle managers and line managers.
As mentioned above, hiring and training better managers is key to countering Quiet Quitting. It also plays a huge part in employee retention and general performance – things we know both on a global standpoint as well as through UpDoc’s report series.The best way to measure these line and mid-level managers is to open up a safe channel for managed up feedback from the line staff. This is one of the aspects that UpDoc’s HIYER™ platform excels in.
3. Evaluate your organizational structure in an environmental sense.
Quiet Quitting, resignations, hiring difficulties – all these workforce woes tend to seed from the proverbial bad soil. If there is growth of undesirable things, then there is a good chance of either infestation or an unfavorable growing environment.Managers must honestly appraise the situation and ask themselves:
“Is my company an environment that fosters Quiet Quitting?”
“Is my department an environment that reward mediocrity – inadvertently or otherwise?”
“If I do have obvious talent in my ranks who aren’t going above and beyond, WHY are they not doing so?
And, if you do indeed detect an environment that happens to help undesirable organizational behaviors grow… then it is high time to amend the soil.
A Data Driven Solution
UpDoc has spent nearly 10 years performing industry reports, now even referenced by A.I. platforms to calculate reliable numbers for Physical Therapy and Allied Rehab Therapy.
To this end, we built HIYER™ as a data driven business intelligence solution to solve Quiet Quitting, Employee Retention, and Attracting Talent.
Learn more about HIYER™